Scry Fund

AI Power

The 800VDC Datacenter Trade

AI racks need higher-voltage power. The stock question is who gains content per megawatt.

27 May 2026 · YK Research

The Mispricing

“The market still talks about AI power like one big basket. That is lazy. 800VDC does not lift every datacenter supplier equally. It moves dollars per MW from old AC and UPS equipment into DC power racks, protection, connectors, power semis, battery racks, and eventually solid-state transformers.”
YK Research
Rack power target
600kW+
Current drop
~15x
Loss math
I²R
Savings at 1GW
~50MW+

The edge is not buying anything with “AI infrastructure” in the slide deck. The edge is finding the companies where 800VDC increases content per megawatt and where consensus has not yet modeled the mix shift.

Why 800VDC Happens

The Trade Is Content Migration Per MW800VDC does not make datacenters cheap. It changes who gets paid.TodayAC + UPS + 48VOld stackPhase 1/2Sidecar power rackNew white-space contentPhase 3Facility 800VDCBattery rack + DC buswayPhase 4SSTMV-to-800VDC conversionYK Research, based on SemiAnalysis 800VDC architecture work and OCP Diablo 400 specifications.

Physics

At 600kW per rack, 48-54V means huge current, heavy copper, heat, and routing problems. Higher voltage cuts current and makes dense racks practical.

Economics

The goal is lower cost per token. Dense racks keep more traffic inside fast scale-up links. That needs much more power per rack.

Architecture

Early deployments add sidecar power racks. Later sites move 800VDC distribution upstream and replace more of the old AC stack.

Stock Selection

The winners are not just “datacenter suppliers.” They are suppliers gaining dollars per MW as the electrical architecture changes.

Stocks That Benefit

VRT
Power racks
Vertiv

The cleanest US-listed way to express the trade. Vertiv sells datacenter power and thermal systems. It should benefit if sidecar power racks, high-density power shelves, and cooling complexity keep growing.

ETN
Protection
Eaton

Strong fit for switchgear, breakers, power distribution, and DC protection. The Resilient Power acquisition also gives Eaton a path into solid-state transformer technology.

SU.PA / SBGSF
Electrical stack
Schneider Electric

Large datacenter electrical supplier. It can lose some legacy UPS content but win if it owns the replacement stack: DC distribution, power management, controls, and services.

ABBN.SW / ABBNY
DC protection
ABB

Good exposure to electrification, DC breakers, switchgear, and SST ecosystems. The article also points to ABB-backed DG Matrix as an important SST player.

2308.TW
Rectifiers / CDU
Delta Electronics

One of the more direct equipment plays. Delta shows up in rectifiers, power shelves, busway programs, and cooling distribution units for high-density datacenters.

IFX.DE / IFNNY
Power semis
Infineon

Benefits from SiC, GaN, battery backup conversion, and high-voltage power electronics. If 800VDC scales, the semiconductor layer becomes more valuable.

TEL
Connectors
TE Connectivity

High-voltage connectors, cables, sensors, and EV-grade component overlap. Less pure, but the architecture needs more specialized interconnect hardware.

APH
Connectors
Amphenol

Similar logic to TE. High-voltage cabling and connector content should rise as racks move to 800VDC and cable-based power links replace some busbar designs.

HUBB / NVT / LR.PA
Distribution
Hubbell / nVent / Legrand

These are more indirect. They benefit if DC busway, enclosures, protection, and facility electrical products become larger categories.

010120.KS
DC breakers
LS Electric

Interesting niche. The article highlights LS Electric's UL-certified 1500V DC molded case breaker for datacenter applications.

FLEX
Manufacturing
Flex

Indirect beneficiary. 800VDC systems need specialized manufacturing, validation, safety, and rack-level integration.

PWR
Grid / EPC
Quanta Services

Not an 800VDC hardware play. It benefits from the grid, interconnection, and construction complexity around AI datacenters.

Stocks That Do Not Benefit

The obvious losers are not easy to isolate because the large incumbents sell both the old stack and the new stack. Eaton, Schneider, ABB, and Vertiv can lose legacy UPS dollars and still win more back in DC hardware.

  • UPS-only suppliers: Phase 2 starts deleting centralized UPS content. If a supplier only owns that box, 800VDC is a threat.
  • 48V-only rack power: Low-voltage distribution becomes less attractive as rack density rises. Board-level conversion remains, but the old layer shrinks.
  • AC-only busway: Facility-level 800VDC needs DC-rated busway and protection. AC-only suppliers need a credible DC roadmap.
  • Conventional transformers without SST path: Solid-state transformers can remove low-voltage transformers and rectifiers over time.
  • Generator-heavy backup: Batteries, supercapacitors, and BESS can reduce some backup-generator dependence over time. Not today, but the direction is clear.

The Trap

“Do not short an incumbent just because one product line gets cannibalized. The right question is net content per MW. If the company loses UPS dollars but gains DC racks, breakers, controls, and services, it may still be a winner.”
YK Research

This is why the trade is subtle. 800VDC is a mix shift first. Total electrical content per MW may not collapse. The dollars move between boxes and suppliers.

My Ranking

Most direct

  • VRT
  • 2308.TW Delta Electronics
  • ETN
  • Schneider Electric
  • ABB
  • Infineon
  • TE Connectivity / Amphenol

Good, but less direct

  • Hubbell
  • nVent
  • Legrand
  • LS Electric
  • Flex
  • Quanta Services

Relevant, but risky

  • Wolfspeed has relevant SiC technology, but the equity has execution and balance-sheet risk.
  • Private SST names matter: DG Matrix, Novos Power, Heron Power, Amperesand.

What Breaks the Thesis

  • Adoption delay: 800VDC remains stuck in hyperscaler pilots because safety codes, UL certification, and local approvals move slowly.
  • Valuation: VRT, ETN, Schneider, ABB, and power-infra baskets may already price in too much AI capex growth.
  • Standards fragmentation: ±400V, monopolar 800V, grounding choices, and vendor-specific designs can slow multi-vendor scaling.
  • Capex air pocket: If hyperscalers slow AI datacenter orders, every supplier in the chain gets hit.

How I Would Track It

  • Hyperscaler references to 800VDC-native racks and facilities.
  • OCP Diablo 400 supplier announcements and multi-vendor interoperability tests.
  • UL certification for DC breakers, busway, and SSTs.
  • Backlog / book-to-bill commentary from VRT, ETN, Schneider, ABB, Delta, and Infineon.
  • Whether AI power names gain content per MW or only ride the same capex wave.

Sources

Core architecture and TAM framing: SemiAnalysis, “Inside the 800VDC Revolution – Part 1”, May 2026.
Rack standardization: Open Compute Project, Diablo 400 specification, May 2025.
Nvidia architecture context: Nvidia, 800 VDC Architecture for AI Data Centers.
Company exposure references: SemiAnalysis article above; OCP Diablo 400 supplier ecosystem; public company product and acquisition announcements from Eaton, ABB, Schneider Electric, Delta Electronics, Infineon, TE Connectivity, Amphenol, Hubbell, nVent, Legrand, LS Electric, Flex, and Quanta Services.